⚠ For in-vitro research purposes only. Strictly not for human or veterinary use.
Australian Peptide Lab kangaroo logo

Peptide Molarity Calculator

Convert between the mass of peptide on the balance and the molar concentration an assay is designed around. In Mass → molarity mode, enter the molecular weight, the peptide mass in mg and the solution volume in mL to get mM, µM, µmol, nmol and mg/mL. In Molarity → mass mode, enter a target in µM and a volume to get the mass to weigh. The compound menu fills in molecular weights from our compound monographs; for any other sequence, take the average MW from the peptide molecular weight calculator.

Results

Molar concentration
2.5 mM
= 2,500 µM
Amount of peptide
5 µmol
= 5,000 nmol
Mass concentration
2.5 mg/mL

Assumes 100% peptide content. Divide by net peptide content (e.g. 0.8 for 80%) to correct for counter-ions and water.

Provided for laboratory calculation convenience only. All compounds sold by Australian Peptide Lab are for in-vitro research use only — not for human or veterinary use.

Receptor binding, enzyme kinetics and concentration–response curves count molecules, not milligrams, so a peptide weighed in mg has to be converted through its molecular weight before it means anything in an assay. The calculator does that conversion in both directions.

The formulas

QuantityFormula
Amount (µmol)mass (mg) ÷ MW (g/mol) × 1,000
Concentration (mM)amount (µmol) ÷ volume (mL)
Mass to weigh (mg)target (µM) × volume (mL) × MW (g/mol) ÷ 1,000,000

A useful check: keep the prefix and multiply by 1,000 ÷ MW. A concentration in mg/mL becomes mM, µg/mL becomes µM and ng/mL becomes nM. For a 1,000 g/mol peptide, 1 mg/mL is exactly 1 mM.

Worked example: Epithalon in both modes

Epithalon (Ala-Glu-Asp-Gly) has an average MW of 390.35 g/mol.

ModeInputsResults
Mass → molarity10 mg in 4.0 mL25.618 µmol; 6.405 mM (6,404.5 µM); 2.5 mg/mL
Molarity → mass50 µM in 25 mL1,250 nmol; 0.488 mg (487.9 µg)
Same, at 80% net peptide content50 µM in 25 mL0.610 mg to weigh

Same mass, different molarity

Molar concentration scales inversely with molecular weight, so equal mass concentrations of different peptides are not equal in molecules:

PeptideAverage MW (g/mol)1 mg/mL equalsMass for 2.0 mL at 1 mMAt 80% net peptide content
GHK (free tripeptide)340.382.938 mM0.681 mg0.851 mg
Epithalon390.352.562 mM0.781 mg0.976 mg
Ipamorelin711.851.405 mM1.424 mg1.780 mg
Selank751.871.330 mM1.504 mg1.880 mg
Semax813.921.229 mM1.628 mg2.035 mg
BPC-1571419.540.704 mM2.839 mg3.549 mg

At 1 mg/mL, GHK supplies more than four times as many molecules as BPC-157. Comparing two peptides at the same µg/mL therefore compares different molar concentrations, so design comparisons in molar units. The copper complex sold as GHK-Cu has a higher MW than the free tripeptide, and the GHK-Cu guide explains which figure to use.

Net peptide content and salt form

The calculator assumes the mass entered is all peptide. A lyophilised powder also contains counter-ions and water, so apply net peptide content (NPC):

  • Mass → molarity: enter gross mass × NPC.
  • Molarity → mass: divide the result by NPC (0.488 mg ÷ 0.80 = 0.610 mg above).

Counter-ion mass can be worked out from the sequence. Each protonated basic group pairs with one counter-ion: trifluoroacetic acid adds 114.02 g/mol and acetic acid 60.05 g/mol. A 1,000 g/mol peptide carrying two trifluoroacetates weighs 1,228.05 g/mol as the salt, so only 81.4% of the dry mass is peptide before any water is counted; as the diacetate it would be 89.3%. The TFA versus acetate guide covers how salt forms arise.

Counter-ions also travel at molar ratios. A 1 µM working solution of a peptide with three trifluoroacetates contains 3 µM trifluoroacetate. In fetal rat osteoblast cultures, trifluoroacetate at 10–100 nM reduced cell numbers and thymidine incorporation after 24 h, and TFA salts of amylin and calcitonin showed less proliferation than the hydrochlorides [1]. Where exact quantities matter, NPC is measured rather than assumed; a consensus group led by the US National Cancer Institute's proteomics consortium recommended well-characterised peptide reference standards so that amino acid analysis methods agree [2]. For APL vials, ask for the batch documentation.

Unit pitfalls

  • Mass is in mg. Enter 250 µg as 0.25.
  • Volume is in mL. Enter 500 µL as 0.5.
  • Targets are in µM. Enter 10 nM as 0.01 and 2 mM as 2,000.
  • Use the right variant's MW. A C-terminal amide, an N-terminal acetyl group or a disulfide changes the formula; the molecular weight calculator handles these options.
  • Complete dissolution is assumed. A cloudy solution has a lower concentration than calculated; see peptide solubility.

The molarity calculations guide works through the full chain from vial to assay well.

Frequently asked questions

Should the average or the monoisotopic mass be used for molarity?

The average molecular weight. A weighed sample contains the natural mix of isotopes, which is what the average mass describes. Monoisotopic mass and [M+H]⁺ belong to mass spectrometry. For a peptide the size of BPC-157 the two differ by less than 0.1% (1419.54 versus 1418.70), so swapping them is a small error, but it is still the wrong number for the job.

How is a nanomolar solution made with a mass-based calculation?

Not by weighing. One millilitre of 10 nM BPC-157 contains about 14 ng, far below what a balance can weigh. Calculate a mM or high-µM stock here, then step down with the dilution calculator. In Molarity → mass mode, nM targets can be entered as decimals of µM (10 nM = 0.01 µM) to check the arithmetic.

Does the salt form change the molecular weight to enter?

It changes which mass goes with which MW. Either enter the free-peptide MW with a mass already multiplied by net peptide content, or enter the salt-form MW with the gross mass. The second route accounts for counter-ions but not water. Gross mass with free-peptide MW, the uncorrected default, overstates the moles of peptide.

How is the molarity of a blend vial calculated?

Component by component. A blend such as CJC-1295 (No DAC) + Ipamorelin contains two peptides with different molecular weights, so one mass cannot give one molarity. Run the calculator once for each component with its own stated mass and MW; the peptide blends guide covers what else changes when two peptides share a vial.

Should HPLC purity be corrected for as well?

In principle, yes: mass of target peptide = gross mass × net peptide content × HPLC purity. For material specified at ≥99% by HPLC, the purity term moves the result by 1% or less, whereas net peptide content routinely moves it by much more. Correct for net peptide content first; peptide purity explains why the two numbers measure different things.

References

  1. 1.Cornish J, Callon KE, Lin CQ, et al. Trifluoroacetate, a contaminant in purified proteins, inhibits proliferation of osteoblasts and chondrocytes. Am J Physiol. 1999. PubMed 10567002
  2. 2.Hoofnagle AN, Whiteaker JR, Carr SA, et al. Recommendations for the Generation, Quantification, Storage, and Handling of Peptides Used for Mass Spectrometry-Based Assays. Clin Chem. 2016. PubMed 26719571

Related guides

More lab tools

Australian owned & operatedHPLC + mass-spec tested batchesDispatched express from Australian stockSecure Australian card payments